05-01-202605-01-2026<p>This work aimed to compare the stand-alone hydrothermal carbonization process (HTC) coupled with anaerobic digestion (AD) for the treatment of HTC-process water in terms of technical, economic, and environmental performance. Three scenarios were evaluated: (i) Stand-alone HTC, (ii) HTC integrated with AD (HTC + AD_1), and (iii) HTC integrated with an improved AD that uses hydrochar (HTC + AD_2). The industrial process was designed and modeled based on experimental data previously obtained for the co-treatment of the organic fraction of municipal solid waste and sewage sludge. The results show that net thermal energy (HTC = 53 kWh/t_{raw material}, HTC + AD_1 = 120 kWh/t_{raw material}, HTC + AD_2 = 84 kWh/t_{raw material}) and net electrical energy (HTC = 149 kWh/t_{raw material}, HTC + AD_1 = 187 kWh/t_{raw material}, HTC + AD_2 = 187 kWh/t_{raw material}) increased in the integrated scenarios by up to 126 % and 26 % respectively, compared to the stand-alone HTC due to extra energy from biogas. Nevertheless, the increase in methane production (58 vs. 153 NmLCH₄/gVS) owing to the hydrochar addition did not supply the contribution of direct hydrochar combustion in power plants. Compared to the stand-alone HTC, the waste treatment cost with the cogeneration unit increased by 62 % due to the annexed AD plant. The total annualized cost ranges from 101 (HTC) to 127 (HTC + AD_1) USD/t_{raw material}, which is expected to decrease in all scenarios (up to 31 USD/t_{raw material}) by increasing the plant capacity (up to 100,000 t/year). The integrated configurations reduce the total environmental impact points (up to 85 %) compared to the stand-alone HTC due to the valorization of the HTC-process water and the replacement of coal fuel.</p>info:eu-repo/semantics/restrictedAccessAnaerobic digestionEnvironmental impactHydrocharHydrothermal carbonizationTechno-economicSDG 7 - Affordable and Clean EnergySDG 11 - Sustainable Cities and CommunitiesSDG 12 - Responsible Consumption and ProductionArticle