¿ESTÁ EL DERECHO PENAL AL MARGEN DE DISCUSIONES AXIOLÓGICAS? A PROPÓSITO DE LA SENTENCIA DEL TRIBUNAL CONSTITUCIONAL CHILENO SOBRE LA DESPENALIZACIÓN DE LA INTERRUPCIÓN DEL EMBARAZO

Simple item page
dc.coverageDOI: 10.7764/R.491.10
dc.creatorGuerra Espinosa, Rodrigo Andrés
dc.creatorMadrid, Raúl
dc.creatorCornacchia, Luigi
dc.date2022
dc.date.accessioned2025-11-18T19:49:58Z
dc.date.available2025-11-18T19:49:58Z
dc.description<p>This paper makes some comments on the Chilean Constitutional Court's ruling related to the new regulation presented by article 119 of the Health Code. This modification allows the homicide of the unborn beyond sate of necessity. The aim is to show that, in opposition to what the Constitutional Court's prevention indicates, the problem of the new article 119 is in an axiological field. The legal-criminal thesis presented in this article is based on the meta-rule of double effect, which requires a distinction to be made between actions in which the homicide of an innocent person (per se) is sought and those in which death is triggered as a collateral effect (per accident) in situations of state of necessity.</p>eng
dc.identifierhttps://investigadores.uandes.cl/en/publications/a9134e20-5beb-42b6-a9f1-e7658d426631
dc.identifier.urihttps://repositorio.uandes.cl/handle/uandes/56367
dc.languagespa
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.sourcevol.49 (2022) date: 2022-04-01 nr.1 p.173-192
dc.subjectdouble efffect meta-rule
dc.subjectmoral absolutism
dc.subjectnecessity defense
dc.subjectSDG 16 - Peace, Justice and Strong Institutions
dc.title¿ESTÁ EL DERECHO PENAL AL MARGEN DE DISCUSIONES AXIOLÓGICAS? A PROPÓSITO DE LA SENTENCIA DEL TRIBUNAL CONSTITUCIONAL CHILENO SOBRE LA DESPENALIZACIÓN DE LA INTERRUPCIÓN DEL EMBARAZOspa
dc.titleIS CRIMINAL LAW IN THE MARGIN OF AXIOLOGICAL FOUNDATIONS? CONCERNING THE DECRIMINALIZATION OF ABORTION IN THE CHILEAN CONSTITUTIONAL COURT JUDGMENTeng
dc.typeArticleeng
dc.typeArtículospa
Files
Collections
PURE