Why Radio is More Reliable Than Television During Social Protests: An Explanation Through Framing Theory
| dc.coverage | DOI: 10.1080/19376529.2025.2467095 | |
| dc.creator | Tagle, Francisco | |
| dc.date | 2025 | |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2025-11-18T19:44:13Z | |
| dc.date.available | 2025-11-18T19:44:13Z | |
| dc.description | <p>This study applies the framing model of Semetko and Valkenburg (2000) to analyze media coverage of the Chilean social protests of 2019, with a particular emphasis on differences between radio and television coverage. This model uses 20 distinct questions to identify specific frames used in news reporting. These findings indicate that the predominant frame across all protest coverage was Attribution of Responsibility, though this frame was even more prevalent for radio. For television, the results suggest a lower focus on the protesters’ demands, with a tendency to portray the events as a political conflict.</p> | eng |
| dc.identifier | https://investigadores.uandes.cl/en/publications/a72d3959-a602-495c-a62b-167cd7558072 | |
| dc.identifier.uri | https://repositorio.uandes.cl/handle/uandes/53292 | |
| dc.language | eng | |
| dc.rights | info:eu-repo/semantics/restrictedAccess | |
| dc.source | (2025) | |
| dc.title | Why Radio is More Reliable Than Television During Social Protests: An Explanation Through Framing Theory | eng |
| dc.type | Article | eng |
| dc.type | Artículo | spa |