Evaluation of dental shade guide variability using cross-polarized photography

dc.coverageDOI: 10.11607/prd.2700
dc.creatorGurrea, Jon
dc.creatorGurrea, Marta
dc.creatorBruguera, August
dc.creatorSampaio, Camila Sobral
dc.creatorJanal, Malvin
dc.creatorBonfante, Estevam
dc.creatorCoelho, Paulo G.
dc.creatorHirata, Ronaldo
dc.date2016
dc.date.accessioned2025-11-18T19:40:10Z
dc.date.available2025-11-18T19:40:10Z
dc.descriptionThis study evaluated color variability in the A hue between the VITA Classical (VITA Zahnfabrik) shade guide and four other VITA-coded ceramic shade guides using a Canon EOS 60D camera and software (Photoshop CC, Adobe). A total of 125 photographs were taken, 5 per shade tab for each of 5 shades (A1 to A4) from the following shade guides: Vita Classical (control), IPS e.max Ceram (Ivoclar Vivadent), IPS d.SIGN (Ivoclar Vivadent), Initial ZI (GC), and Creation CC (Creation Willi Geller). Photos were processed with Adobe Photoshop CC to allow standardized evaluation of hue, chroma, and value between shade tabs. None of the VITA-coded shade tabs fully matched the VITA Classical shade tab for hue, chroma, or value. The VITA-coded shade guides evaluated herein showed an overall unmatched shade in all tabs when compared with the control, suggesting that shade selection should be made using the guide produced by the manufacturer of the ceramic intended for the final restoration.eng
dc.identifierhttps://investigadores.uandes.cl/en/publications/ded1c2c2-769f-4141-81b5-0c43969acc75
dc.identifier.urihttps://repositorio.uandes.cl/handle/uandes/51150
dc.languageeng
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/restrictedAccess
dc.sourcevol.36 (2016) date: 2016-01-01 nr.5 p.e76-e81
dc.subjectTooth color
dc.subjectReliability
dc.subjectRepeatability
dc.subjectDentistry
dc.subjectAccuracy
dc.subjectDevices
dc.titleEvaluation of dental shade guide variability using cross-polarized photographyeng
dc.typeArticleeng
dc.typeArtículospa
Files
Collections