MELANCHTHON AND PROTESTANT ARISTOTELIANISMS: THE CASE OF THE COMMENTARIES ON THE ETHICS AND THE POLITICS

Simple item page
dc.coverageDOI: 10.17398/2340-4256.19.791
dc.creatorSvensson, Manfred
dc.date2024
dc.date.accessioned05-01-2026 18:15
dc.date.available05-01-2026 18:15
dc.description<p>Contrary to what is suggested by the myth of a radical break, the Aristotelian tradition of practical philosophy was widely cultivated in early Protestantism. Recognition of this fact, however, often goes hand in hand with a monolithic reduction of Protestant Aristotelianism to its Melanchthonian origins. The present article seeks to make Charles Schmitt’s attention to the multiplicity of Renaissance Aristotelianisms fruitful for the case of the Protestant commentators of Aristotle, thus offering a more precise view of Melanchthon’s place in that tradition.</p>eng
dc.identifierhttps://investigadores.uandes.cl/en/publications/24eff39c-cdd4-4eea-ac52-863710bec7a6
dc.languagespa
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.sourcevol.19 (2024) p.791-816
dc.subjectAristotle
dc.subjectCharles Schmitt
dc.subjectNicomachean Ethics
dc.subjectPhilip Melanchthon
dc.subjectProtestant Aristotelianism
dc.titleMELANCHTHON AND PROTESTANT ARISTOTELIANISMS: THE CASE OF THE COMMENTARIES ON THE ETHICS AND THE POLITICSeng
dc.titleMELANCHTHON Y LOS ARISTOTELISMOS PROTESTANTES: EL CASO DE LOS COMENTARIOS A LA ÉTICA Y LA POLÍTICAspa
dc.typeArticleeng
dc.typeArtículospa
Files
Collections
Pure-CRIS