Fibrinolytic alveolitis, since 1896: Contemporary concepts and quandaries: contemporary concepts and quandaries.

Simple item page
dc.coverageDOI: 10.17126/joralres.2018.001
dc.creatorNoujeim, Ziad E.F.
dc.creatorHaidar, Ziyad S.
dc.date2018
dc.date.accessioned2026-01-05T21:11:14Z
dc.date.available2026-01-05T21:11:14Z
dc.descriptionDuring basic and specialized training, we’re often told that<br/>socket preservation is standard of care. Today, we wonder, is it? If not, why<br/>not? We were also voiced much about atraumatic extraction and the simple<br/>technique of socket grafting, especially in areas where bone and soft tissue<br/>shrinkage would impede proper pontic aesthetics and implant placement.<br/>What about retained roots, trauma to other structures, damage to developing<br/>(underlying) permanent teeth, and need for tension-less flaps at suture line?<br/>Are dentists following? Do we in the smile zone, at least? Besides, why are<br/>we still questioned, almost on a regular basis, by residents as well as fellow<br/>clinicians whether to irrigate or not, post-extraction? Concerns, we thought<br/>to address celebrating the end of 2017, or in better words, ~120 years since<br/>coining the term “dry socket” for the first time.spa
dc.identifierhttps://investigadores.uandes.cl/en/publications/d68d5f85-d92c-4c87-ba38-9bf6acb0829a
dc.identifier.urihttps://repositorio.uandes.cl/handle/uandes/64725
dc.languageeng
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.sourcevol.7 (2018) date: 2018-01-22 nr.1 p.8-10
dc.titleFibrinolytic alveolitis, since 1896: Contemporary concepts and quandaries: contemporary concepts and quandaries.eng
dc.typeArticleeng
dc.typeArtículospa
Files
Collections
Pure-CRIS