The constitutional protection of intangible assets in Chile and the problem of their determination in contracts between private parties

Simple item page
dc.coverageDOI: 10.5944/rdp.122.2025.44753
dc.creatorMedina Krause, Francisco
dc.date2025
dc.date.accessioned05-01-2026 18:22
dc.date.available05-01-2026 18:22
dc.description<p>Despite all the doubts surrounding the “proprietaryization of rights”, in Chile there seems to be a basic consensus: goods of an incorporeal nature can be constitutionally guaranteed through the right of property. Property over rights. This has been demonstrated by national jurisprudence for more than three decades, under the auspices of a doctrinal discussion that prefers to discuss the scope of this legal technique, rather than question its foundations. However, a key question persists in the development of property ownership in Chile and in the scope of its constitutional recognition: what, exactly, is an incorporeal good? Until the answer to this question reaches agreement, it will be difficult to advance on other topics of interest on the subject, so its clarification becomes a priority. Thus, after a brief historical, doctrinal and jurisprudential review, in this work we propose some guiding criteria in the elucidation of the question posed.</p>eng
dc.identifierhttps://investigadores.uandes.cl/en/publications/ed1cc38f-a4a1-41a5-8f29-856797b45b8c
dc.languagespa
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.sourcevol.122 (2025) p.355-396
dc.subjectincorporeal good
dc.subjectincorporeal property
dc.subjectOwnership
dc.subjectproperty right
dc.titleThe constitutional protection of intangible assets in Chile and the problem of their determination in contracts between private partieseng
dc.titleLA PROTECCIÓN CONSTITUCIONAL DE LOS BIENES INCORPORALES EN CHILE Y EL PROBLEMA DE SU DETERMINACIÓN EN LOS CONTRATOS ENTRE PRIVADOSspa
dc.typeReview articleeng
dc.typeArtículo de revisiónspa
Files
Collections
Pure-CRIS